[ad_1]
In a letter shot off to the prime minister on August 25 this 12 months, the physique argued that if the pensions of the Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies usually are not taxable, then why does the federal government levy revenue tax on the pension of retired staff.
“Each retired particular person is paid pension as a superannuation fund for his/her livelihood on account of serving the nation for thus a few years.
“Now, the query is raised why the revenue tax is levied on pension (of retired staff). This isn’t an revenue for any service or work. If MPs and MLAs pension isn’t taxable, why our pension is taxed?” the physique said within the letter.
The physique in its first all-India convention held at Shirdi (Maharashtra) on July 23, 2018 has resolved that pension must be exempted from revenue tax. Since then, this challenge is constantly being raised by this organisation with the finance minister, however there isn’t a response from the ministry, it said.
Within the letter to the PM, the physique added, “Bharatiya Pensioners Manch urges upon you to kindly intervene into the matter and direct the Ministry of Finance to think about this lengthy pending real demand of pensioners. An early and fast motion with a line of reply to this organisation will likely be extremely appreciated.”
The physique additionally said that it wrote to the Minister of Finance on the problem on August 23, 2018, on December 14, 2018 and on February 25, 2021.
Referring to their earlier letters written to the Minister of Finance, the physique mentioned, “We’re sorry to say that nothing has been achieved to date on this regard.”
The physique additionally referred to an apex court docket order the place the Supreme Courtroom had held that pension is efficacious proper vested in a authorities servant and that the suitable to obtain pension is a property underneath Article 31 of the Structure. Whether it is denied to an worker, a writ of mandamus might be issued to the state to correctly think about the declare of the pensioner for fee of pension in response to legislation, it added referring to the SC ruling.
[ad_2]
Source link