[ad_1]
By Simon Jessop
LONDON (Reuters) – Europe’s banks are proving gradual to behave on sustainability and have solely a restricted grasp of their publicity to environmental, social and governance-related dangers, a report for the European Fee by asset supervisor BlackRock (NYSE:) confirmed.
The report, which can be used to assist combine sustainability into banking prudential guidelines, had proved contentious given the U.S. agency’s function as an investor in most of the banks.
The bloc’s government was chastised by European Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly (NASDAQ:) in November for failing to correctly think about conflicts of curiosity within the awarding of the contract to BlackRock’s Monetary Markets Advisory unit.
O’Reilly stated that the Fee had not failed in making use of its procurement course of, however that its guidelines on conflicts of curiosity have been too obscure and ought to be modified sooner or later.
In a 273-page report based mostly on information and insights from a spread of banking sector and different stakeholders, launched on Friday, the research stated policymakers ought to take extra motion.
“Regardless of elevated efforts by banks and supervisors, this research finds that the tempo of implementation to attain efficient ESG integration inside threat administration, prudential supervision, and enterprise methods and funding insurance policies must be accelerated,” the report stated.
Banks are more and more coming beneath stress from buyers and activists over their function within the international transition to a low-carbon economic system, significantly over their function in funding heavy emitting corporations in sectors equivalent to vitality and utilities.
Among the many findings, the report stated banks didn’t have a typical definition of ESG dangers, with most lenders but to map how completely different ESG dangers feed into monetary threat and only some having a threat technique in place.
“ESG elements are broadly, albeit generally superficially, built-in inside lending insurance policies, credit score utility processes, and due diligence, specifically for chosen high-risk sectors,” the report stated.
“Nevertheless, protection is usually restricted and, for instance, off-balance sheet funding exercise related to advisory or debt capital markets is usually not in scope.”
Integration of ESG threat into threat fashions and stress testing “is at an early stage”, and most banks have but to combine it into their inner threat reporting frameworks, it added.
Among the many conclusions, the report recommended banks and supervisors work to develop a granular definition of the ESG dangers, with some stakeholders calling for formidable methods with measurable targets and timelines.
A Fee spokesperson stated the chief deliberate to organise a dialogue on the report along with members of the European Parliament and different stakeholders, and would use the content material of the report to assist formulate future coverage proposals.
BlackRock’s FMA, which operates individually from the asset administration unit, stated in an announcement that it was happy to ship its research, as per its mandate from the Fee.
[ad_2]
Source link