[ad_1]
“20021” might seem like a random string of numbers or a mangled date, however many Weibo customers comprehend it as an indication that they’re being blocked from posting “delicate” content material. Telegram person @cybergraveyardcn (简中赛博坟场) just lately despatched CDT crowdsourced, categorized information documenting a few years and types of Weibo censorship. The report, translated under, consists of screenshots of error messages, notices, and different indications {that a} submit has been censored on Weibo. @cybergraveyardcn has since made the total report public on Telegram. Readers can view extra Weibo censorship archives in @cybergraveyardcn’s channel by looking the time period “#微博存档” (Weibo Archives).
Notice: All the content material is my very own work. Photos had been chosen at random to function examples, and don’t signify my very own private views. Please forgive me for any errors you might discover. Created: February 12, 2020
I. Unable to submit or show
1. (Error 20021) Sorry, unable to carry out the present operation resulting from content material in violation of related legal guidelines and laws or the phrases of the Weibo Neighborhood Settlement. (The submit is blocked due to particular content material.)
2. Feedback containing delicate phrases can’t be seen. Known as “remark gobbling” for brief.
II. Picture or video censored
1. Picture can’t be opened.
2. Video has been deleted.
3. Picture will be opened from the timeline on the homepage, however not from the submit itself. (On this case, animated GIFs that can not be connected are often official pictures containing the names of state leaders.)
An instance through which video content material has been deleted (II.2). Put up content material: “Love ought to be tolerant and respectful, no matter who you might be, regardless or race or ethnicity, no matter sexual orientation.” Weibo censorship messages: “Please wait a second. [We are] within the strategy of consulting.” “Good day, it has been verified that this video is in violation: it promotes an incorrect view of affection and marriage.”
III. Restrictions
1. Restricted circulation. The variety of views is zero or a really low quantity. Put up doesn’t seem within the person’s timeline.
2. “Repost” button robotically disappears from submit. Solely “remark” and “like” buttons are displayed. Content material can solely be seen by mutual associates.
3. Repost and remark capabilities are regular, however the contents of reposts and feedback usually are not seen.
4. Reposting disabled from unique submit (“repost” button is grey), however can repost from different customers’ reposts.
5. Commenting disabled. Feedback can’t be seen. Put up will be reposted, and reposts are nonetheless seen.
6. Repost and remark capabilities disabled. Put up can’t be reposted or replied to.
7. “Likes” disabled.
8. Put up will be reposted, however the full textual content of the unique submit can’t be seen.
9. Blocked from enhancing submit.
10. Blocked from selling submit [a paid service].
11. Creator has elected to show feedback selectively.
IV. Contents of submit censored
1. “Repost” button disappears after a sure variety of reposts. Content material is barely seen to mutual associates.
2. One other person has reported you for violating laws. In accordance with Weibo’s Guidelines for Studies and Complaints, … [sic] has been deleted.
3. This submit has been deleted for violating related legal guidelines and laws and the Weibo Guidelines for Studies and Complaints. Displayed as Error 20112: Permission to view this submit has been quickly revoked.
4. Account inspected by cyber police for alleged violation of laws; content material processed for violation of laws.
5. Each unique submit and repost chain have been deleted.
6. Authentic submit not deleted, however reposts in chain have been selectively deleted.
7. Customer support makes Large V account viewable by account proprietor solely.
An instance through which customer support makes Large V account viewable by account proprietor solely (IV.7). Consumer remark: “However why?” Weibo censorship message: “Good day, the Weibo content material you posted at 02:20:34 on February 1, 2020 can now not be displayed usually. It is suggested that sooner or later you chorus from posting or forwarding equally delicate content material (or commenting on delicate content material) to keep away from disruptions to the traditional functioning of your account.” Consumer remark: “That is simply…an excessive amount of.”
V. Search censored
1. Account exists, however doesn’t seem within the search bar.
2. Search outcomes solely present content material from verified customers.
3. In accordance with related legal guidelines and laws, search outcomes can’t be displayed.
VI. Bans
1. Likes not permitted. Likes disappear robotically.
2. Reposts not permitted. Reposts seem to work, however don’t seem on the person’s web page.
3. (Error 20016) Up to date too continuously. Triggered by a number of reposts inside a brief time period.
4. Should enter verification code to observe, unfollow, like, remark, or repost.
5. Since you just lately posted content material that violates related nationwide legal guidelines and laws, your Weibo account is suspended for seven days/30 days/90 days/one 12 months/and so forth. You might or might not obtain a non-public message notifying you of the suspension.
VII. Account deleted
Uncommon exercise has been detected in your Weibo account. Please reactivate your account to revive regular perform. (Error 3022608) Generally referred to as account bombing. Account web page shows the message “Consumer doesn’t exist,” and posts present the message, “This account can’t be seen as a result of the person has been reported for violating related legal guidelines and laws and the phrases of the Weibo Neighborhood Settlement,” or “Content material doesn’t exist.” [Chinese]
An instance of a deleted account message (VII). Consumer quantity 5227144311 / Likes 0 / Followers 0 / Account profile quickly unavailable / Error message: “This account can’t be seen as a result of the person has been reported for violating related legal guidelines and laws and the phrases of the Weibo Neighborhood Settlement.”
Translation by Anne Henochowicz.
CDT has independently verified a number of the pictures included within the report. For instance, one screenshot exhibits that nationalistic influencer Ren Yi, higher referred to as Chairman Rabbit (兔主席 @jeune), posted a picture with a caption in Chinese language that learn “The hypocritical mob is a ‘most cancers’ on the rule of regulation.” The screenshot exhibits that the picture had been eliminated, a standard censorship methodology on Weibo, the place longer texts are sometimes shared as pictures. CDT discovered that Chairman Rabbit used the very same title in a weblog submit dated July 14, 2019. The weblog submit additionally included a picture of a brief essay through which he criticized Hong Kong protesters. It’s doubtless that he posted the picture on Weibo, and that it was later eliminated, as proven in @cybergraveyardcn’s screenshot.
One other screenshot exhibits that Weibo person @欧洲文艺评论 posted, “Some genius translated the title of American Gilead’s new drug ‘Remdesivir’ as ‘Folks’s Hope’” (美国吉利德的新药Remdesivir，竟然被高人翻译为“人民的希望”). (The drug title, Ruìdé xīwéi 瑞德西韦 sounds much like rén[mín] de xīwàng 人[民]的希望 [people’s hope].) The screenshot exhibits that the submit’s remark perform was disabled. CDT was unable to find the unique submit, however different posts made across the similar time (February 2020) attribute the sentence to the identical creator.
[ad_2]
Source link
