In 1997 China promised to guard Hong Kong’s freedoms for the subsequent 5 a long time—however simply 25 years after the handover, Hong Kong is now a police state. So how did China crush Hong Kong?
00:00 – How China crushed Hong Kong
00:44 – Tiananmen sq. bloodbath vigil banned
02:37 – China’s ambition since 1842: reclaim Hong Kong
04:16 – How China wanted Hong Kong’s booming enterprise
05:30 – President Xi’s purpose to crush Hong Kong
07:30 – How China infiltrated Hong Kong society
08:51 – The techniques of the Chinese language Communist Occasion
11:42 – How exiled Hong Kongers are talking out
13:00 – What can the world study from Hong Kong?
See the complete multimedia article about Hong Kong:
Signal as much as our day by day publication for the newest protection:
Will the Communist Occasion be the puppet grasp behind the brand new Hong Kong chief
Hong Kong’s media crackdown
Hong Kong’s new legislature is a mockery of democracy
Artists in exile proceed to struggle for Hong Kong’s freedom
China is cautious of Hong Kong’s bureaucratic elite
China crushes Hong Kong’s impartial information shops
The seven books that finest clarify Hong Kong’s historical past
source
Britain didn’t give HK back to China because of some agreement. Had Britain cared about HK’s democracy, it would have let HK elect their own leaders. Britain had to give HK back to China was because Britain invaded HK and signed a 99 year lease with China, and Britain had to leave when the lease was over.
How did the British get Hong Kong? You should've started from that.
Why are there so many CCP bots on here? Their schemes of upvoting each other’s comments to then drag western useful idiots into it too is obvious.
Communist party pledged autonomy of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang back in 1950s. Everyone knows what happened next? But please rest assured, HKers are highly educated, globalized and knows the simple and yet nasty tricks of the communist party.
Hong Kong has no democracy under British rule and is completely obedient. The essential reason is that Chinese Mainland's cities are developing too fast, and Hong Kong's sense of vanity is getting weaker and weaker
No business with you
How dare you??????
Poland has been erased from the map for 123 years, polish language was prohibited and the economy was being exploted by the occupants. But even when not a single person remembering Poland was still alive anymore, the polish sentiment kept burning in hearts and minds until a favorable situation occurred and Poland was restored.
Hong Kong has been shaped by the Chinese and the British but is now a separate entity and will never extinguish, not even in hundreds of years. Things will change with time and Hong Kong will be free again one day.
Why is it that the Economist always conviently leave out historical/global contexts when making articles/videos. Colonialism happened and still informs the decision making of non-Western policy makers. This is an issue because negating this information makes it easy to show a negative connotation to anti-Western agendas. People who assimilate into Eurocentric thought should keep their toys in their cots and move to Europe or the US and stop interfering with the sovereignty of other states. Imagine if China excerted the same amount of influence that the West has on HK or Taiwan in Scotland or Texas. The West would sanction or threaten military intervention under the guise of protecting the territorial integrity of the state, why isn't China able to exert the same amount of sovereignty over it's territory than the West? The Economist needs to address it's Eurocentrist pov the world deserves better journalism.
UK's colonial ruling of Hong Kong is over, FOREVER.
A video full of sour regrets of colonist who lost their control of a colony
The consequences of statism
It is sad that freedom no longer rings in Hong Kong. Will it be subdued forever?
china use a lot of immigrants and students to infiltrate. so beware Australia and uk.
Watch this English video clip as an objective assessment of what happened then. There are 4 clips altogether
Economist is paid by NED, USA to lie, tarnish and brainwash all people through news and TV broadcast. Economist is one of the group medias to gang up to make lie and deceive the world over.
Respect to the journalists.
In HK, beating ppl seriously to almost death and silencing ppl's voice = peaceful protester per journalist from the West. When the same happen in US capital hill and UK, its riots per the same joirnalist.
Amazed by those propagandistic comments lol. China knows how to spend their people’s money on paid comments rather than the people living inside.
Econmist, a racist journal, try tp teach others on human right. Hahahahaha, amusing. 🙂
Economist 🤣🤣🤣