[ad_1]
A have a look at historical past and actuality tells us a distinct story.
In recent times, sure Nato international locations, clinging to a Chilly Warfare mentality and the hegemony logic, have pursued bloc politics and exhausted their efforts in containing China, looking for to broaden Nato’s geographical parameters underneath the pretext of addressing the so-called China problem.
However one can’t assist however surprise, does China, a rustic tens of 1000’s of miles away, actually pose any problem to Nato, an organisation that “seeks to advertise stability and well-being within the North Atlantic space”?
Who’s waging wars and growing army build-up, and who’s difficult international safety and threatening world peace? It is clear for all to see. Details are details, which can’t be distorted by disinformation.
The Chinese language nation all the time loves peace, and the pursuit of peace is a part of its cultural DNA. As one of many world’s strongest international locations for a very long time in historical past, China has by no means colonised or invaded others.
After the Age of Discovery, the fleets of European powers rampaged to grab colonies.
Nonetheless, almost 100 years earlier than Columbus found the Americas, a Chinese language navigator named Zheng He led what was then essentially the most highly effective fleet on the planet on seven expeditions to the Pacific Ocean and the western Indian Ocean, visiting over 30 international locations and areas with out taking a single inch of land.
Over the previous 70 years because the founding of the Folks’s Republic, China has pursued an impartial international coverage of peace and a nationwide defence coverage that’s defensive in nature. China follows the trail of peaceable improvement and stays a contributor to world peace and a defender of the worldwide order.
China has by no means initiated a warfare or invaded an inch of one other nation’s land.
China continues to be the one nation on the planet that undertakes to comply with a path of peaceable improvement in its structure. China doesn’t intrude in others’ inner affairs and export ideology, nonetheless much less have interaction in long-arm jurisdiction, unilateral sanctions, or financial coercion.
‘Bullying’
For the sake of pursuing equity and justice and eliminating bullyism, we invite Nato, an organisation that gathers essentially the most developed and self-proclaimed most civilised international locations, to take the identical place.
On the very same day that China efficiently examined its first atomic bomb, the Chinese language authorities declared its “No First Use” (NFU) coverage, making China the one nuclear-weapon state to have made such an specific dedication.
We might love to ask the three nuclear international locations in Nato make the identical dedication. On condition that China has fewer nuclear weapons than any of them, one can’t consider any cause why they need to be afraid to take action.
At current, China’s army spending is simply 1 / 4 of that of the US and even smaller if in contrast with that of Nato as an entire. China’s army finances accounts for about 1.3 p.c of its GDP, a lot decrease than the brink of Nato international locations.
China’s per capita army spending is beneath the worldwide common and fewer than one-fifth of that of Nato. It might be a good and cheap demand to ask Nato international locations reduce their army spending to the identical stage as China earlier than pointing fingers.
China upholds true multilateralism and international strategic stability. China is the biggest contributor of peacekeepers among the many everlasting members of the UN Safety Council and the second-largest contributor amongst all international locations to the UN peacekeeping finances. China has despatched greater than 40,000 peacekeepers, making optimistic contributions to sustaining world and regional peace and stability.
Which ‘rules-based worldwide order’?
Nato claims that it’s dedicated to upholding the rules-based worldwide order. However the query is what sort of guidelines and order it’s going to defend. Whether it is a world multilateral system centred on the UN, a world order underpinned by worldwide legislation and primary norms of worldwide relations based mostly on the needs and ideas of the UN Constitution, it would actually be welcomed with open arms.
Nonetheless, if Nato makes an attempt to impose its personal guidelines and even “guidelines of gang” on the worldwide neighborhood, it is going to be rejected flatly.
Nato claims to be a defensive organisation, however what we’ve seen is that it waged wars in opposition to sovereign states, creating enormous casualties and leaving tens of tens of millions displaced. Has the UN Safety Council authorised these actions? If not, hadn’t Nato distorted and abused the precise to self-defence? Do not such actions represent breach of worldwide legislation?
Nato claims that its defence zone is not going to transcend the North Atlantic, however its presence is in every single place.
In recent times, it has flexed its muscle tissues within the Asia-Pacific area and sought to fire up bloc confrontation right here, because it has accomplished in Europe. What number of wars waged by one in every of its member states, whose 240-plus-year historical past solely sees 16 years with out warfare with others, had been defensive?
The tragedy of the 2 World Wars and the Ukraine disaster tells us that hegemony, group politics and bloc confrontation convey no peace or safety, however solely lead towars and conflicts.
It additionally reminds us that blind religion within the so-called “place of power” and makes an attempt to broaden army alliances and search its personal safety on the expense of others will solely land oneself in a safety dilemma.
The world has entered a brand new interval of volatility and transformation. The rise of Chilly Warfare mentality, bloc confrontation and energy politics poses a critical risk to world peace and safety.
On the annual assembly of the Boao Discussion board for Asia this yr, Chinese language president Xi Jinping put ahead the World Safety Initiative, calling on all nations to remain dedicated to the imaginative and prescient of frequent, complete, cooperative and sustainable safety, respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all international locations, abiding by the needs and ideas of the UN Constitution, taking the reliable safety considerations of all international locations significantly, peacefully resolving variations and disputes between international locations by means of dialogue and session, and sustaining safety in each conventional and non-traditional domains.
‘Jackals and wolves’
China stands able to strengthen solidarity and cooperation with all peace-loving international locations to observe true multilateralism, construct a brand new sort of worldwide relations based mostly on mutual respect, equity, justice and win-win cooperation. We should be clear that we’re a neighborhood wherein all international locations share a standard stake and make concerted efforts for international peace and stability.
China wants improvement and longs for peace. We sincerely hope to dwell in concord and develop along with all international locations and organisations on the planet.
Nonetheless, the historical past of China tells us that peace can by no means be a present from others. As a substitute, it must be defended firmly.
We is not going to be naive about Nato’s Strategic Idea. There’s a well-known Chinese language music with these lyrics: “For our mates, we’ve wonderful wine. For jackals or wolves, we welcome with shotguns.”
[ad_2]
Source link